Huckabee backs GodTube
January 29, 2008News: Mike Huckabee (a pastor himself) has posted a video on GodTube — the Christian video sharing site — backing the site. He states:
Well, the reason GodTube is an important part of the election process is because this myth that Christians ought to keep to themselves in the church, and never get outside — that’s like saying, let’s never let the salt get onto things that are spoiling. Let’s never let the light actually show up in a dark places to illuminate the path.
That’s the craziest thing I’ve ever heard. The whole point of being a Christian is to penetrate the darkness, is to preserve the things that are spoiling, and I don’t know of anything more spoiled, more decadent, than politics.
So if there’s ever a place where there ought to be a concentration of Christian activity and involvement, I’d say it’s in politics and government.
So GodTube is helping to be that bridge to get people from the world of the spiritual into the mission field of politics.”
Analysis: Smart move for Mike.
New Hampshire debate: candidates get really chippy
January 6, 2008News: Yesterday’s presidential debates in New Hampshire brought out the wood. John McCain and Mike Huckabee took shots at Mitt Romney in the first debate, while Hillary Clinton took shots at Barack Obama and John Edwards, who in turn took shots at Clinton. If you watch the focus group graphs, the negative attacks didn’t seem to work.
Huckabee makes snide remark at Romney
McCain makes snide remark at Romney
McCain and Romney get into huge fight over immigration positions
Clinton attacks Obama health care plan and changed positions
Edwards attacks Clinton as status quo; Clinton attacks change rhetoric w/o action
Hillary Clinton gives “reality check” on Edwards, Obama records
YouTube to cover Iowa caucuses
December 21, 2007News: The Des Moines Register and YouTube will be soliciting videos from people on the Iowa caucuses as things unfold. You can submit your video starting today.
Is there a subliminal cross in Huckabee’s Christmas video on YouTube?
December 18, 2007
News: Mke Hucakabee just posted his latest YouTube video. It’s a Christmas message. Some cable news channel indicated that there’s a subliminal cross in the background next to the tree. You be the judge.
Chuck Norris endorses Mike Huckabee on YouTube — is he now the Republican front runner?
December 6, 2007
I used to be a political junkie in high school and a little in college. Not anymore these days. But I do think I have a modest skill in analyzing the political landscape. Several years ago, I told a friend of mine that Rudy Giuliani will be the front runner to get the Republican nomination. He said there’s no way the conservatives would back him, the guy had too much baggage and liberal leaning social policies. I said, 9/11.
Then, just several months ago, I suggested to another friend that Mike Huckabee has a chance on the Republican side. That was when the political pundits said that he had none. Well, today, Huckabee is leading the polls in Iowa. You heard that right, Huckabee is now on top in Iowa. And he’s surging in the polls nationally. Apparently, getting the endorsement of Chuck Norris helped.
Huckabee’s also surging on YouTube. His first video with Chuck Norris (see below) is, by my account, the only video on YouTube from one of the candidates, Republican or Democrat, that has received over 1 million views.
By the way, none of this post should be taken as my endorsement of any candidate.
John Edwards goes negative on Hillary Clinton’s “double talk,” the politics of parsing
November 2, 2007
News: The Edwards campaign is going on the offensive on YouTube, with this attack ad on Hillary Clinton, who had a shakier performance in the last debate (as shown on the video).
[DISCLAIMER: This is not an endorsement of any candidate.]
Mike Huckabee – Ron Paul exchange in FOX debate
September 7, 2007
News: Fox had its second debate this week for the Republican presidential candidates. The best, most substantive exchange occurred between Mike Huckabee and Ron Paul.
Analysis: The debate format should allow more of these exchanges, where the candidates can engage each other in a more open debate. CNN and YouTube should take notes for their Republican debate in December. If you’re wondering, the FOX Internet poll after the debate had, you guessed it, Ron Paul winning the debate.
Interview about my study on the presidential candidates on YouTube
August 27, 2007News: I was interviewed in an op-ed published in the Columbus Dispatch about the study I conducted on the presidential candidate videos on YouTube. As you might have guessed, the hot topic of conversation was Ron Paul.
Will skipping YouTube debate hurt Romney + Giuliani, and Republicans in ‘08?
August 1, 2007News: The backlash appears already in full force, as both Rudy Giuliani and Mitt Romney decided — for “scheduling” and “snowman” reasons — to skip the scheduled YouTube debate co-sponsored by the Republican party of Florida. (More from Wash Post) The debate, planned for September, has been scrapped for now, given the no-shows by the 2 leading Republicans. The blog world has been abuzz with how this will hurt their campaigns.
Analysis: My guess, and hope, is that it will all be worked out at a different time. If Giuliani and Romney don’t join, that will only look bad for them. If someone like Fred Thompson joined by then for a rescheduled debate, those two would have no choice but to be a part of the debate.
If you Google Ron Paul
July 28, 2007
News: More video of Ron Paul’s visit to Google on July 13. Looks like Dr. Paul blew away the crowd. It’s still hard to believe that Ron Paul is the most exciting candidate of all the candidates so far. At least on the Internet and YouTube, Ron Paul is a rock star.
I promise to have my study of the Ron Paul YouTube phenomenon soon.
How CNN botched the YouTube presidential debate
July 24, 2007News: The first “experiment” is over. Today, we have time to reflect on what happened — and didn’t happen — in last night’s presidential debate for the Democratic candidates. As I said in my last post, I give CNN and YouTube an A for the idea of user-generated questions, but a C+ for the execution. Here’s what CNN messed up (although the Democratic Party and candidates may have been responsible for the format):
1. There was no opportunity for real debate or exchanges among candidates. The candidates had only 1 minute or 30 seconds to answer questions. No substantive question was asked of each of the candidates–meaning we never got the chance to compare all the candidates on a single question, even though many of the YouTube users posed their questions specifically to the entire group of candidates. For a 2 hour debate, that’s pretty appalling.
CNN, however, chose not to allow all the candidates a chance to answer. Sen. Dodd even expressed frustration at not having a chance to answer the important question about global warming. The only question that CNN posed to the entire group of candidates was the stupid last question in which the candidates were asked to say something they liked about the candidate on their left, and then something they didn’t like. Are we back in 1st grade?
2. Anderson Cooper played favorites with the candidates and skipped over Senator Gravel. Sen. Mike Gravel protested not getting asked many questions compared to the other candidates repeatedly during the debate. By my count, Gravel got only 9 questions (often trivial ones), while Barack Obama got 19 questions. Don’t even include the guy on stage if you are not really going to include him in the debate.
3. CNN excluded all questions from children, but then included a question from a snowman. Cooper said that he thought the parents were using their children to ask their questions. So what? The guy who used the snowman got on CNN’s debate. Remember, from the mouth of babes.
4. CNN used only 11 questions from female questioners, but 28 questions from male questioners. OK, I don’t know the relative breakdown in the pool of 3,000 questions. But the disparity in questions between male and females was very noticeable to me.
5. Having follow up with 2 of the questioners live in the audience only wasted time. This really didn’t work. Anderson Cooper asked, “Did they answer your question?” One of the guys basically said he couldn’t hear the answer because someone next to him was making noise. The other guy used his follow up to say that he wanted to have the question asked of Hillary Clinton.
6. CNN chose some pretty gimmicky questions for laughs and even wasted more time showing questions not used for more laughs. CNN wasted precious time on videos shown to generate laughs–a snowman asking a question, a guy singing and asking for a pardon on his parking ticket, two country guys asking if the talk about Al Gore running for president hurt their feelings, the last question asking each candidate to say something good and bad about the person to the left. There probably were more, but you get the picture.
7. The 30-second campaign videos were nice, but took time away from the debate. I liked the campaign videos, but just have people go to YouTube to watch them. CNN shouldn’t take away precious time from the debate.
CNN-YouTube debate over — thankfully
July 24, 2007News: After 2 hours, the debate is over. You can see all of the 39 video questions asked of the candidates here.
Analysis: I just did a BBC radio interview about the debate. I’ll try to get a link. CNN-YouTube get an A for the concept of user-generated questions. But I give them a C+ for execution. Hopefully, things will improve for the Republican debate.
The 1-minute and 30-second format for answers was far too restrictive, allowing very little interchange among the candidates, and most of the debate just looked and sounded like a conventional debate. And the parts that were unconventional were often gimmicky. YouTube’s Steve Grove, aka CitizenTube, probably could’ve done a better job than Anderson Cooper in moderating.
I don’t want to sound too negative because several of the questions from YouTubers were quite effective, particularly the ones that were just a little more personal. The questions were different and, I believe, better than standard questions from journalists. The questions were, for example, the minimum wage question from two young women, the gay marriage question from two lesbian women, the question from the pastor to John Edwards about the use of religion on the issue of gay marriage, the question from the parent who lost his son in Iraq, and the questions about health care from several people dealing with cancer, diabetes, Alzheimer’s.
[I'll try to follow up with a fuller write-up.]
Tonight: CNN-YouTube presidential debate
July 23, 2007News: Tonight at 7 p.m. on CNN is the Democratic presidential debate co-sponsored by YouTube. All of the questions will come from videos sent in by people on YouTube. Anderson Cooper will moderate. Videos will be shown on a huge screen and at each candidate’s podium. YouTube received close to 3,000 questions. You can sample them here. I’ve noted one question below:
Posted by utubeblog
Posted by utubeblog
Posted by utubeblog 





