<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: YouTube suspends the account of PS22 chorus &#8212; why?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://theutubeblog.com/2009/07/11/youtube-suspends-the-account-of-ps22-chorus-why/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://theutubeblog.com/2009/07/11/youtube-suspends-the-account-of-ps22-chorus-why/</link>
	<description>an unofficial blog on YouTube + the video file sharing industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 03:12:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: YouTube reinstates terminated channel of PS22 chorus &#171; The Utube Blog</title>
		<link>http://theutubeblog.com/2009/07/11/youtube-suspends-the-account-of-ps22-chorus-why/#comment-87640</link>
		<dc:creator>YouTube reinstates terminated channel of PS22 chorus &#171; The Utube Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 18:08:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theutubeblog.com/?p=2947#comment-87640</guid>
		<description>[...] channel of PS22&#160;chorus  News: The saga continues, apparently with a happy ending. I&#8217;ve already chronicled here how, earlier this summer, YouTube terminated for &#8220;terms of use&#8221; violation the account of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] channel of PS22&nbsp;chorus  News: The saga continues, apparently with a happy ending. I&#8217;ve already chronicled here how, earlier this summer, YouTube terminated for &#8220;terms of use&#8221; violation the account of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: remote control mower man</title>
		<link>http://theutubeblog.com/2009/07/11/youtube-suspends-the-account-of-ps22-chorus-why/#comment-87617</link>
		<dc:creator>remote control mower man</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2009 23:09:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theutubeblog.com/?p=2947#comment-87617</guid>
		<description>I just had the same thing happen to me last week and re-built a new account.  I lost of views and credibility because my videos were appearing in search results as a video result and now, when clicked on it just says disabled due to terms and condition violation.  So my would-be customer is lost.  My new &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fyl6Ej1Dflk&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;remote control mower&lt;/a&gt; videos are slowly-but-surley regaining authority in the video results listings and by the time they have re-established themselves, it will be in the middle of winter when no one buys lawn mowers, even if it is remote controlled.  I would be honored to help you get your class&#039;s videos back on track and better than before by shareing what I have learned while promoting my remote control mowers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just had the same thing happen to me last week and re-built a new account.  I lost of views and credibility because my videos were appearing in search results as a video result and now, when clicked on it just says disabled due to terms and condition violation.  So my would-be customer is lost.  My new <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fyl6Ej1Dflk" rel="nofollow">remote control mower</a> videos are slowly-but-surley regaining authority in the video results listings and by the time they have re-established themselves, it will be in the middle of winter when no one buys lawn mowers, even if it is remote controlled.  I would be honored to help you get your class&#8217;s videos back on track and better than before by shareing what I have learned while promoting my remote control mowers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cica144@girlsandnylons</title>
		<link>http://theutubeblog.com/2009/07/11/youtube-suspends-the-account-of-ps22-chorus-why/#comment-87452</link>
		<dc:creator>cica144@girlsandnylons</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 06:45:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theutubeblog.com/?p=2947#comment-87452</guid>
		<description>OK, I will  dispute it me have to fill out a form and do the whole 4 or 5 factor fair use analysis and hope the copyright holder agrees with me because Youtube doesnât appear to want to make an independent determination for fear of upsetting the people with lawyers on retainer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, I will  dispute it me have to fill out a form and do the whole 4 or 5 factor fair use analysis and hope the copyright holder agrees with me because Youtube doesnât appear to want to make an independent determination for fear of upsetting the people with lawyers on retainer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://theutubeblog.com/2009/07/11/youtube-suspends-the-account-of-ps22-chorus-why/#comment-87405</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 16:42:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theutubeblog.com/?p=2947#comment-87405</guid>
		<description>Youtube is becoming more and more militant with regard to copyright infringement, and not many people working there do any sort of fair use analysis before taking something down that may or may not infringe. This type &#039;disappearing video&#039; thing happens often now.

I don&#039;t know if you&#039;re familiar with their new automated &quot;Content ID Match&quot; system, but it automatically disables the audio of any video that has a part of a song that matches a copyrighted work. In other words, there is no fair use (or parody) of any portion of any copyrighted song allowed for any purpose. If you want to dispute it, you have to fill out a form and do the whole 4 (or 5)-factor fair use analysis and hope the copyright holder agrees with you, because Youtube doesn&#039;t appear to want to make an independent determination for fear of upsetting the people with lawyers on retainer.

Copyright law and the Internet are at war with each other right now because the copyright holders with deep pockets have a massive bargaining advantage in enforcing whatever perceived rights they may have, and there&#039;s little incentive for companies fearful of litigation to stand up for individual users.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Youtube is becoming more and more militant with regard to copyright infringement, and not many people working there do any sort of fair use analysis before taking something down that may or may not infringe. This type &#8216;disappearing video&#8217; thing happens often now.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know if you&#8217;re familiar with their new automated &#8220;Content ID Match&#8221; system, but it automatically disables the audio of any video that has a part of a song that matches a copyrighted work. In other words, there is no fair use (or parody) of any portion of any copyrighted song allowed for any purpose. If you want to dispute it, you have to fill out a form and do the whole 4 (or 5)-factor fair use analysis and hope the copyright holder agrees with you, because Youtube doesn&#8217;t appear to want to make an independent determination for fear of upsetting the people with lawyers on retainer.</p>
<p>Copyright law and the Internet are at war with each other right now because the copyright holders with deep pockets have a massive bargaining advantage in enforcing whatever perceived rights they may have, and there&#8217;s little incentive for companies fearful of litigation to stand up for individual users.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
