<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Second Circuit rules remote storage DVR is legal!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://theutubeblog.com/2008/08/05/second-circuit-rules-remote-storage-dvr-is-legal/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://theutubeblog.com/2008/08/05/second-circuit-rules-remote-storage-dvr-is-legal/</link>
	<description>an unofficial blog on YouTube + the video file sharing industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 03:12:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: John Feeney</title>
		<link>http://theutubeblog.com/2008/08/05/second-circuit-rules-remote-storage-dvr-is-legal/#comment-82900</link>
		<dc:creator>John Feeney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 15:23:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://utubeblog.wordpress.com/?p=1279#comment-82900</guid>
		<description>nancyprager:

Thank you for clearing that up and setting me straight...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nancyprager:</p>
<p>Thank you for clearing that up and setting me straight&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nancyprager</title>
		<link>http://theutubeblog.com/2008/08/05/second-circuit-rules-remote-storage-dvr-is-legal/#comment-82824</link>
		<dc:creator>nancyprager</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 15:35:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://utubeblog.wordpress.com/?p=1279#comment-82824</guid>
		<description>Fair use was not an issue in this case.  The claim was for direct infringement by a commercial party (one element of fair use is that the use must not be commercial).  The court noted that the plaintiffs did not pursue a contributory infringement claim.  That is, the role of the consumer (the end user) was not at at issue.  Had a contributory infringement claim been made the court would have had to consider whether or not the consumer&#039;s use of the content was infringing, or whether fair use applied. 

Nancy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fair use was not an issue in this case.  The claim was for direct infringement by a commercial party (one element of fair use is that the use must not be commercial).  The court noted that the plaintiffs did not pursue a contributory infringement claim.  That is, the role of the consumer (the end user) was not at at issue.  Had a contributory infringement claim been made the court would have had to consider whether or not the consumer&#8217;s use of the content was infringing, or whether fair use applied. </p>
<p>Nancy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Feeney</title>
		<link>http://theutubeblog.com/2008/08/05/second-circuit-rules-remote-storage-dvr-is-legal/#comment-82785</link>
		<dc:creator>John Feeney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 15:33:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://utubeblog.wordpress.com/?p=1279#comment-82785</guid>
		<description>Here come the Pirates, selling/trading an monetizing libraries of content all under the flag of Fair Use.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here come the Pirates, selling/trading an monetizing libraries of content all under the flag of Fair Use.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
