<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Supreme Court rules 2nd Amendment right to &#8220;keep + bear arms&#8221; &#8212; why should Free Speech supporters and technology companies be happy?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://theutubeblog.com/2008/06/26/the-supreme-court-rules-that-people-have-a-2nd-amendment-right-to-keep-bear-arms-why-should-free-speech-backers-be-happy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://theutubeblog.com/2008/06/26/the-supreme-court-rules-that-people-have-a-2nd-amendment-right-to-keep-bear-arms-why-should-free-speech-backers-be-happy/</link>
	<description>an unofficial blog on YouTube + the video file sharing industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 03:12:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Thanks to Scotus blog + Wall St. Journal law blog &#171; The Utube Blog</title>
		<link>http://theutubeblog.com/2008/06/26/the-supreme-court-rules-that-people-have-a-2nd-amendment-right-to-keep-bear-arms-why-should-free-speech-backers-be-happy/#comment-80746</link>
		<dc:creator>Thanks to Scotus blog + Wall St. Journal law blog &#171; The Utube Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 17:24:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://utubeblog.wordpress.com/?p=1127#comment-80746</guid>
		<description>[...] for Supreme Court action) and Dan Slater at Wall Street Journal&#8217;s law blog for refrerence my last post that suggests how the Supreme Court&#8217;s decision in the gun case (DC v. Heller) is helpful [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] for Supreme Court action) and Dan Slater at Wall Street Journal&#8217;s law blog for refrerence my last post that suggests how the Supreme Court&#8217;s decision in the gun case (DC v. Heller) is helpful [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Law Blog - WSJ.com : Is Heller Scalia's Most Important Majority Opinion? And More on the Case</title>
		<link>http://theutubeblog.com/2008/06/26/the-supreme-court-rules-that-people-have-a-2nd-amendment-right-to-keep-bear-arms-why-should-free-speech-backers-be-happy/#comment-80741</link>
		<dc:creator>Law Blog - WSJ.com : Is Heller Scalia's Most Important Majority Opinion? And More on the Case</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 16:19:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://utubeblog.wordpress.com/?p=1127#comment-80741</guid>
		<description>[...] impact on regulation of speech technologies: It&#8217;s a bit over our head too. But over at the Utube blog, Edward Lee, an IP prof at Ohio State U.&#8217;s Moritz College of Law, argues that, for technology [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] impact on regulation of speech technologies: It&#8217;s a bit over our head too. But over at the Utube blog, Edward Lee, an IP prof at Ohio State U.&#8217;s Moritz College of Law, argues that, for technology [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: curtismo</title>
		<link>http://theutubeblog.com/2008/06/26/the-supreme-court-rules-that-people-have-a-2nd-amendment-right-to-keep-bear-arms-why-should-free-speech-backers-be-happy/#comment-80708</link>
		<dc:creator>curtismo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 04:18:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://utubeblog.wordpress.com/?p=1127#comment-80708</guid>
		<description>two words jury nullification , if you dont like a law ,or don&#039;t believe in the case you are sitting thru jury duty on, vote not guilty ,this is your greatest power and you do not have to explain yourself to no one for the way you vote</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>two words jury nullification , if you dont like a law ,or don&#8217;t believe in the case you are sitting thru jury duty on, vote not guilty ,this is your greatest power and you do not have to explain yourself to no one for the way you vote</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jake</title>
		<link>http://theutubeblog.com/2008/06/26/the-supreme-court-rules-that-people-have-a-2nd-amendment-right-to-keep-bear-arms-why-should-free-speech-backers-be-happy/#comment-80686</link>
		<dc:creator>Jake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 19:14:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://utubeblog.wordpress.com/?p=1127#comment-80686</guid>
		<description>Is there a ‘warming effect’ then to guns as well - in the same way you claim there is a warming effect to copyright laws?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there a ‘warming effect’ then to guns as well &#8211; in the same way you claim there is a warming effect to copyright laws?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
