http://theutubeblog.com/2007/06/29/youtube-gives-smosh-back-views-after-take-down-of-pokemon-video/ an unofficial blog on YouTube + the video file sharing industry Sat, 24 Oct 2009 03:12:13 +0000 http://wordpress.com/ hourly 1 http://theutubeblog.com/2007/06/29/youtube-gives-smosh-back-views-after-take-down-of-pokemon-video/#comment-43276 Mr. X Sat, 08 Sep 2007 00:00:45 +0000 http://theutubeblog.com/2007/06/29/youtube-gives-smosh-back-views-after-take-down-of-pokemon-video/#comment-43276 i posted a fandub of pokemon and got an email that "4Kids Entertainment, Inc. has requested the video be removed". I went to the URL and got the youtube homepage plus "This Video is no longer available due to a copyright claim by 4Kids Entertainment, Inc." Damn 4kids and their stupid leader, Al Kahn. i posted a fandub of pokemon and got an email that “4Kids Entertainment, Inc. has requested the video be removed”. I went to the URL and got the youtube homepage plus “This Video is no longer available due to a copyright claim by 4Kids Entertainment, Inc.” Damn 4kids and their stupid leader, Al Kahn.

]]> http://theutubeblog.com/2007/06/29/youtube-gives-smosh-back-views-after-take-down-of-pokemon-video/#comment-27058 milowent Fri, 06 Jul 2007 00:11:12 +0000 http://theutubeblog.com/2007/06/29/youtube-gives-smosh-back-views-after-take-down-of-pokemon-video/#comment-27058 re smosh, the parody defense is a no-go. they played the actual pokemon song in the video, that's the copyright violation. their acting may be a taste violation or something, but it doesn't save the video. if they'd played the same music and sang altered lyrics, that would have done it. re smosh, the parody defense is a no-go. they played the actual pokemon song in the video, that’s the copyright violation. their acting may be a taste violation or something, but it doesn’t save the video. if they’d played the same music and sang altered lyrics, that would have done it.

]]>