<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Update on YouTube&#8217;s take down of Smosh Pokemon video</title>
	<atom:link href="http://theutubeblog.com/2007/06/18/update-on-youtubes-take-down-of-smosh-pokemon-video/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://theutubeblog.com/2007/06/18/update-on-youtubes-take-down-of-smosh-pokemon-video/</link>
	<description>an unofficial blog on YouTube + the video file sharing industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 03:12:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Gx</title>
		<link>http://theutubeblog.com/2007/06/18/update-on-youtubes-take-down-of-smosh-pokemon-video/#comment-23048</link>
		<dc:creator>Gx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2007 03:54:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theutubeblog.com/2007/06/18/update-on-youtubes-take-down-of-smosh-pokemon-video/#comment-23048</guid>
		<description>&quot;Under the DMCA, a website has a greater chance of staying within the safe harbor (and avoiding copyright liability) if it expeditiously removes content identified by a copyright holder in a DMCA notice.&quot;  Actually, under the DMCA, one MUST expeditiously remove or block access to content in order to take advantage of the 512(c) safe harbor. (And that, of course, is only one criterion.)  If you don&#039;t takedown/block access in response to a valid, complete DMCA notice of copyright infringement, yer out, son. :) Gx</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Under the DMCA, a website has a greater chance of staying within the safe harbor (and avoiding copyright liability) if it expeditiously removes content identified by a copyright holder in a DMCA notice.&#8221;  Actually, under the DMCA, one MUST expeditiously remove or block access to content in order to take advantage of the 512(c) safe harbor. (And that, of course, is only one criterion.)  If you don&#8217;t takedown/block access in response to a valid, complete DMCA notice of copyright infringement, yer out, son. <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  Gx</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
