<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Viacom v. YouTube &#8212; what the lawsuit is about</title>
	<atom:link href="http://theutubeblog.com/2007/04/19/viacom-v-youtube-what-the-lawsuit-is-about/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://theutubeblog.com/2007/04/19/viacom-v-youtube-what-the-lawsuit-is-about/</link>
	<description>an unofficial blog on YouTube + the video file sharing industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 03:12:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Howard</title>
		<link>http://theutubeblog.com/2007/04/19/viacom-v-youtube-what-the-lawsuit-is-about/#comment-6708</link>
		<dc:creator>Howard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2007 22:36:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theutubeblog.com/2007/04/19/viacom-v-youtube-what-the-lawsuit-is-about/#comment-6708</guid>
		<description>Hey 

Thanks for the summary of the legal issues surrounding this lawsuit.  A nice, easy-to-follow summary.  

Personally, I&#039;m not convinced that YouTube can last through this suit.  As Shelly Palmer has pointed out -- such as in his article &lt;a href=&quot;http://advancedmediacommittee.typepad.com/emmyadvancedmedia/2006/11/youtube_without.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&quot;Where&#039;s the Business?&lt;/a&gt; -- YouTube&#039;s model is based on user-generated piracy.  (Not user-generated content.)

I don&#039;t see how such a service can remain. 

Howard</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey </p>
<p>Thanks for the summary of the legal issues surrounding this lawsuit.  A nice, easy-to-follow summary.  </p>
<p>Personally, I&#8217;m not convinced that YouTube can last through this suit.  As Shelly Palmer has pointed out &#8212; such as in his article <a href="http://advancedmediacommittee.typepad.com/emmyadvancedmedia/2006/11/youtube_without.html" rel="nofollow">&#8220;Where&#8217;s the Business?</a> &#8212; YouTube&#8217;s model is based on user-generated piracy.  (Not user-generated content.)</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t see how such a service can remain. </p>
<p>Howard</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nick</title>
		<link>http://theutubeblog.com/2007/04/19/viacom-v-youtube-what-the-lawsuit-is-about/#comment-6700</link>
		<dc:creator>nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2007 21:35:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theutubeblog.com/2007/04/19/viacom-v-youtube-what-the-lawsuit-is-about/#comment-6700</guid>
		<description>What is the Netcom defense?  Does the pre-DMCA jurisprudence on BBS&#039;s exist separately from the DMCA safe harbors, or does it merely inform the DMCA analysis?  I know that the DMCA doesn&#039;t preclude other defenses to infringement, but if I lose DMCA safe harbor status then what in Netcom might save me besides fair use?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is the Netcom defense?  Does the pre-DMCA jurisprudence on BBS&#8217;s exist separately from the DMCA safe harbors, or does it merely inform the DMCA analysis?  I know that the DMCA doesn&#8217;t preclude other defenses to infringement, but if I lose DMCA safe harbor status then what in Netcom might save me besides fair use?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
