<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Will YouTube replace TV?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://theutubeblog.com/2006/11/27/will-youtube-replace-tv/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://theutubeblog.com/2006/11/27/will-youtube-replace-tv/</link>
	<description>an unofficial blog on YouTube + the video file sharing industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 03:12:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: yiddo</title>
		<link>http://theutubeblog.com/2006/11/27/will-youtube-replace-tv/#comment-1280</link>
		<dc:creator>yiddo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Dec 2006 14:59:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://utubeblog.wordpress.com/2006/11/27/will-youtube-replace-tv/#comment-1280</guid>
		<description>YouTube is better than TV!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>YouTube is better than TV!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Brazeal</title>
		<link>http://theutubeblog.com/2006/11/27/will-youtube-replace-tv/#comment-996</link>
		<dc:creator>David Brazeal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2006 14:07:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://utubeblog.wordpress.com/2006/11/27/will-youtube-replace-tv/#comment-996</guid>
		<description>This is fascinating, and you know the Old Guard is scratching its collective head over questions of &quot;quality.&quot;  The production is better on TV.  The acting is better.  The writing is often better.  It&#039;s obvious this is not about &quot;quality&quot; at all -- not in the way we have always thought of quality.  Instead, the online video phenomenon is about matching interests. It&#039;s cable TV on steroids.  Even 500 channels is not enough when the audience has infinitely diverse interests. So when someone finds a program that exactly matches his interests, the quality of that program doesn&#039;t matter as much as the subject matter.  Topic trumps quality.  Find your voice in a well-chosen topic, and you&#039;re more than halfway there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is fascinating, and you know the Old Guard is scratching its collective head over questions of &#8220;quality.&#8221;  The production is better on TV.  The acting is better.  The writing is often better.  It&#8217;s obvious this is not about &#8220;quality&#8221; at all &#8212; not in the way we have always thought of quality.  Instead, the online video phenomenon is about matching interests. It&#8217;s cable TV on steroids.  Even 500 channels is not enough when the audience has infinitely diverse interests. So when someone finds a program that exactly matches his interests, the quality of that program doesn&#8217;t matter as much as the subject matter.  Topic trumps quality.  Find your voice in a well-chosen topic, and you&#8217;re more than halfway there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
