<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Yahoo tried to buy YouTube</title>
	<atom:link href="http://theutubeblog.com/2006/10/11/yahoo-tried-to-buy-youtube/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://theutubeblog.com/2006/10/11/yahoo-tried-to-buy-youtube/</link>
	<description>an unofficial blog on YouTube + the video file sharing industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 03:12:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Oskar Syahbana</title>
		<link>http://theutubeblog.com/2006/10/11/yahoo-tried-to-buy-youtube/#comment-73</link>
		<dc:creator>Oskar Syahbana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Oct 2006 10:12:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://utubeblog.wordpress.com/2006/10/11/yahoo-tried-to-buy-youtube/#comment-73</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t help it but it seems that Yahoo is a healthier company. Mind you, I&#039;m not doing any in-depth research for this, only based on stock value and cash comparations. Yahoo has 8.something ratio between market valuation and cash while google has like 11.something.

The bigger that ratio is, the worse.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t help it but it seems that Yahoo is a healthier company. Mind you, I&#8217;m not doing any in-depth research for this, only based on stock value and cash comparations. Yahoo has 8.something ratio between market valuation and cash while google has like 11.something.</p>
<p>The bigger that ratio is, the worse.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
